Property Deals Hut

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 27 February 2009

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: Still looking for an editor

Posted on 03:23 by Unknown

While the Elsevier nonlinear science journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals (CS&F) expects to publish its delayed first issue of 2009 next week, it appears that the publisher has yet to find a new editor.



Last November, when Nature published a number of allegations about the founding editor of CS&F M. S. El Naschie, and the way in which peer review had been conducted at the journal, Elsevier informed me that M. S. El Naschie would be retiring, and that this would be announced in the first issue of the journal published in 2009.



"[A]s a former editor El Naschie will no longer be involved in editorial decision making for the journal," Elsevier spokesperson Shira Tabachnikoff added.



When CS&F's first issue of 2009 failed to appear, however, rumours began to circulate on the Internet that there had been a disagreement over M. S. El Naschie's retirement. Amongst other things, letters purporting to have been written on behalf of the editorial board were posted on the Web stating that M. S. El Naschie did not intend to step down as editor, and hinting at legal action against Elsevier.



On 13th February, however, Tabachnikoff emailed me to say that the first issue of 2009 would be available electronically on February 20th, and the paper version would be published on 10th March.



The electronic version failed to appear online on 20th February and, as of today, it is still not available. Currently, the backlog of articles waiting to be published has grown to 965.



I emailed Elsevier last week to find out what had happened, and received a reply yesterday: "The delay in publishing this issue is due to very pragmatic, operational reasons," wrote Tabachnikoff. "The latest update I have been given is that the journal is now in line to be uploaded onto ScienceDirect and we expect on Monday [2nd March] it will be up."



Tabachnikoff added, "The paper version will be published mid-March. March 10th is an estimate as it is hard to say exactly what day it will be finalised."



After receiving this reply I asked Tabachnikoff for the name of CS&F's new editor. She replied: "We do not yet have a new editor, but as stated on our website we are still in discussion about filling this position. The publisher will work with the editorial board and other advisors to identify a new editor, as well as reviewing the aims and scope of the journal, as well as the editorial policies and submission arrangements."



Conscious that researchers have been wondering about the status of the 900 plus papers in the publication queue I also asked whether Elsevier planned to send any of the papers out to be re-reviewed prior to publication.



"The coming editions of CS&F will publish papers that have been pending publication which were already peer reviewed when El Naschie was the editor," said Tabachnikoff. "These papers will not be reviewed again, and authors have signed copyright agreements."



I also asked how many of the papers in the queue had been authored by M. S. El Naschie. "At this point it is hard to establish how many papers in future issues are authored by El Naschie," replied Tabachnikoff. Saying that she hoped to find out more next week she added: "I do know that the first issue will not contain any of his papers."



Finally, I asked if all disagreements between Elsevier and M.S. El Naschie, both over the journal itself, and over his retirement as editor, have now been resolved. Tabachnikoff replied: "At the moment, we have no outstanding issues and/or problems with El Naschie."



Despite a number of attempts I have been unable to speak to M. S. El Naschie.



In the meantime, it seems likely that critics of the way in which Elsevier has handled the situation will remain unappeased. Zoran Škoda, a theoretical physicist at the Ruđer Bošković Institute in Zagreb, Croatia, for instance, believes that by not having papers that were approved under the old editorial regime re-reviewed, Elsevier has "made the worst possible decision."



For this reason, he adds, Elsevier should be criticised harshly. "Before they could say that they did not understand the problem, but now they do."



##



Update 3rd March



As promised by Elsevier, the January 15th issue of CS&F was published yesterday, 2nd March 2009. An accompanying "Publisher's note" reads:



The Founding Editor for Chaos, Solitons and Fractals Dr El Naschie has retired as Editor-in-Chief. The publisher will work with the editorial board and other advisors to identify a new editor. This is likely to also lead to revision of the aims and scope of the journal, as well as the editorial policies and submission arrangements. Prospective authors can keep informed

of the progress on this through the journal’s homepage.



With the journal now apparently operating with no one at the helm the debate appears to be moving on to the question of whether, and for how long, a peer-reviewed journal can operate without an editor-in-chief.



Update 16th March 2010: CS&F has been relaunched with two new co-editors-in-chief, a new editorial board and refined aims and scope.

Read More
Posted in | No comments

Sunday, 15 February 2009

Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: Update

Posted on 04:03 by Unknown

Those following events at the Elsevier journal Chaos, Solitons & Fractals (CS&F) will know that last November Elsevier announced that the founding editor-in-chief M. S. El Naschie was set to retire, and that this would be formally confirmed in the first issue of 2009. A note to that effect was subsequently also posted on the CS&F web site.



What Elsevier didn't say, however, was when the first issue of 2009 would appear. As January came and went, and then February arrived, there has been growing speculation over what might be happening behind the scenes.



But it appears that the journal may soon be back on track: Last Friday, Elsevier spokesperson Shira Tabachnikoff emailed me to say: "the journal manager for Chaos has just informed me that the first issue of 2009 is expected to be out electronically on February 20th and the paper version on March 10th."



Frustratingly, Tabachnikoff did not include the name of a new editor in her message, and I have yet to receive a reply to my email requesting more information.



With luck all will be revealed on Friday.



##



Further update (21st February 2009):



CS&F's first issue of 2009 did not appear yesterday as anticipated. At the end of the day I contacted Elsevier's Shira Tabachnikoff, who said that she would look into it and hope to update me on Monday.



Meanwhile, the journal's Articles in Press page indicates that there are now 949 papers waiting to be published. Clearly that is a substantial backlog.



And another update (November 17th) is available here.





Update 16th March 2010: CS&F has been relaunched with two new co-editors-in-chief, a new editorial board and refined aims and scope.



Read More
Posted in | No comments
Newer Posts Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • Ann Okerson on the state of Open Access: Where are we, what still needs to be done?
    One of a series exploring the current state of Open Access ( OA ), the Q&A below is with Ann Okerson , Senior Advisor on Electronic Stra...
  • Open Humanities Press to publish OA books
    The Open Humanities Press ( OHP ) announced recently that it is entering the Open Access (OA) book publishing market, launching five new OA ...
  • Open Access: Profile of Eberhard Hilf
    Eberhard (Ebs) Hilf is a true veteran of the Open Access ( OA ) movement. A theoretical physicist based in Oldenburg , Hilf began his advo...
  • Open Access in 2009: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    As 2009 draws to a close advocates of Open Access ( OA ) will doubtless be looking back and weighing up the year's events. So what has b...
  • Open Access mandates: Judging success
    As Alma Swan has graphically demonstrated ( here and here ), mandates have begun to propagate nicely. It is worth noting that many of the...
  • Open Access given Papal Blessing?
    In his latest encyclical letter Pope Benedict XVI argues that rich countries are asserting their intellectual property with "excessiv...
  • Open Access: Whom would you back?
    Open Access ( OA ) advocates will tell you that there are two roads to OA. Green OA consists of researchers continuing to publis...
  • Open Access: Rethinking Harvard
    Last week the architect of Harvard’s Open Access ( OA ) policy, Stuart Shieber stated : “the Harvard open-access policy could not be, shoul...
  • Open Access: A publisher's perspective
    In an article I posted on 10th March I discussed the issue of whether the Green and Gold roads to Open Access ( OA ) should be vi...
  • Open Access: Who pays? How much?
    Last month the Scholarly Publishing & Academic Resources Coalition ( SPARC ) launched a new guide called Who pays for Open Access? Th...

Categories

  • ARC
  • Aspesi
  • Australia
  • Big Deal
  • BioOne
  • BMC
  • BOAI
  • Content Mining
  • COPE
  • CUP
  • Data Mining
  • eBooks
  • Elsevier
  • Free Software
  • FRPAA
  • Gold OA
  • Green OA
  • Harnad
  • India
  • InTech
  • ITHAKA
  • Jayakanth
  • John Wilbanks
  • Journal Prices
  • Library of Congress
  • Mandates
  • Michael Eisen
  • Michael Hart
  • MIT Press
  • Murray-Rust
  • Nature
  • NHMRC
  • NIH
  • OA Advantage
  • OASPA
  • OMICS
  • Open Access
  • Open Society Institute
  • Open Source
  • OSTP
  • Peer Review
  • Peter Suber
  • PLoS
  • PLoS ONE
  • Project Gutenberg
  • Repositories
  • Research
  • Research Works Act
  • Robert Kiley
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • RWA
  • Scholarly Publishing
  • Sciyo
  • Select Committee
  • Serials Crisis
  • SPARC
  • Springer
  • Text Mining
  • UC Press
  • UCL
  • Velterop
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Wiley
  • World Bank

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (31)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (43)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2011 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (20)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ▼  2009 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ▼  February (2)
      • Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: Still looking for an e...
      • Chaos, Solitons & Fractals: Update
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (14)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (9)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2006 (27)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ►  2005 (31)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (7)
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (6)
  • ►  2004 (2)
    • ►  August (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile