Property Deals Hut

  • Subscribe to our RSS feed.
  • Twitter
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Facebook
  • Digg

Friday, 2 September 2005

WSIS working group comment on RCUK policy

Posted on 12:41 by Unknown
The Working Group on Scientific Information for the World Summit on the Information Society has publicly released its comment on the draft RCUK policy.

Conclusion:

From the evidences that have been brought forward in those comments, it appears clearly that RCUK proposed position on access to research outputs is not only in full agreement with the recommendations of the World Summit On the Information Society (WSIS), but also with the movement of the Berlin Declaration , the context of the Commission for Africa.

The RCUK proposed position is exactly in line with some of the recent recommendations of the UNESCO thematic meeting held recently in Saint-Petersburg.
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to XShare to Facebook
Posted in | No comments
Newer Post Older Post Home

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)

Popular Posts

  • The Open Access Interviews: Annette Holtkamp
    Richard Poynder talks to Annette Holtkamp, an information professional at Germany's largest particle physics research centre Deutsches...
  • Interview with Richard Jefferson
    Today I am publishing an interview with Richard Jefferson , founder and CEO of CAMBIA , and advocate for the Biological Open Source Movement...
  • Michelle Willmers on the state of Open Access: Where are we, what still needs to be done?
    One of a series exploring the current state of Open Access ( OA ), the Q&A below is with Michelle Willmers , Project Manager of the Open...
  • Open Access in Poland: Interview with Bożena Bednarek-Michalska
    Bożena Bednarek-Michalska is an information specialist and deputy director of the Nicolaus Copernicus University Library in Torun , Poland. ...
  • Dominique Babini on the state of Open Access: Where are we, what still needs to be done?
    Dominique Babini This is the ninth Q&A in a series exploring the current state of Open Access ( OA ). On this occasion the questions are...
  • IEEE’s Anthony Durniak on the state of Open Access: Where are we, what still needs to be done?
    Anthony Durniak The tenth in a series exploring the current state of Open Access ( OA ) the Q&A below is with IEEE’s Anthony Durniak . ...
  • Interview with Lawrence Lessig
    Today I am publishing an interview with Lawrence Lessig , professor of Law at Stanford Law School, founder of Stanford's Center for Int...
  • Ann Okerson on the state of Open Access: Where are we, what still needs to be done?
    One of a series exploring the current state of Open Access ( OA ), the Q&A below is with Ann Okerson , Senior Advisor on Electronic Stra...
  • The Open Access Interviews: Wellcome Trust’s Robert Kiley
    Over the past year Open Access (OA) publishing has gained considerable mindshare, not just amongst researchers and librarians, but publishe...
  • Open Access in 2009: The Good, the Bad and the Ugly
    As 2009 draws to a close advocates of Open Access ( OA ) will doubtless be looking back and weighing up the year's events. So what has b...

Categories

  • ARC
  • Aspesi
  • Australia
  • Big Deal
  • BioOne
  • BMC
  • BOAI
  • Content Mining
  • COPE
  • CUP
  • Data Mining
  • eBooks
  • Elsevier
  • Free Software
  • FRPAA
  • Gold OA
  • Green OA
  • Harnad
  • India
  • InTech
  • ITHAKA
  • Jayakanth
  • John Wilbanks
  • Journal Prices
  • Library of Congress
  • Mandates
  • Michael Eisen
  • Michael Hart
  • MIT Press
  • Murray-Rust
  • Nature
  • NHMRC
  • NIH
  • OA Advantage
  • OASPA
  • OMICS
  • Open Access
  • Open Society Institute
  • Open Source
  • OSTP
  • Peer Review
  • Peter Suber
  • PLoS
  • PLoS ONE
  • Project Gutenberg
  • Repositories
  • Research
  • Research Works Act
  • Robert Kiley
  • Rockefeller University Press
  • RWA
  • Scholarly Publishing
  • Sciyo
  • Select Committee
  • Serials Crisis
  • SPARC
  • Springer
  • Text Mining
  • UC Press
  • UCL
  • Velterop
  • Wellcome Trust
  • Wiley
  • World Bank

Blog Archive

  • ►  2013 (31)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (4)
    • ►  September (5)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (9)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2012 (43)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  July (6)
    • ►  June (4)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (7)
    • ►  January (13)
  • ►  2011 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (2)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  June (5)
    • ►  May (2)
    • ►  March (4)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2010 (20)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  August (3)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (4)
    • ►  March (2)
    • ►  February (3)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2009 (22)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (3)
    • ►  October (2)
    • ►  September (2)
    • ►  August (1)
    • ►  July (2)
    • ►  June (3)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (3)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2008 (14)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (4)
    • ►  September (1)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  February (2)
    • ►  January (2)
  • ►  2007 (9)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ►  July (1)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (1)
    • ►  March (1)
    • ►  February (1)
    • ►  January (1)
  • ►  2006 (27)
    • ►  December (1)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (1)
    • ►  September (6)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (3)
    • ►  April (2)
    • ►  March (7)
    • ►  January (3)
  • ▼  2005 (31)
    • ►  December (3)
    • ►  November (2)
    • ►  October (3)
    • ▼  September (7)
      • Starting a new bushfire
      • Education Guardian | Open access failings 'cost UK...
      • £1.5 billion lost annually in potential return on ...
      • UK library community responds to the RCUK Proposal
      • WSIS working group comment on RCUK policy
      • SPARC | Comments to RCUK
      • BMJ | Results of publicly funded research should b...
    • ►  August (4)
    • ►  June (2)
    • ►  May (1)
    • ►  April (3)
    • ►  March (6)
  • ►  2004 (2)
    • ►  August (2)
Powered by Blogger.

About Me

Unknown
View my complete profile